By Environment
International Ltd.
Protecting
a threatened species is difficult. More difficult is protecting a species
that not only migrates between the vast space of the ocean and countless
inland streams, but also lives in the midst of one of the nation’s
most populous urban areas. On Monday, July 10th, 2000 The National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) unveiled the most ambitious step in their plan
to do so. The NMFS has been working with state and local government
officials in all the affected Pacific Coast states since before the
March 1999 listing of the Puget Sound chinook (and 13 other salmon ESUs)
to develop an effective conservation and recovery strategy for West
Coast salmon. What they have come up with is an innovative integrated
approach to managing threatened species - a so-called “4(d) Rule.”
A
4(d) Rule is promulgated by the agency that has regulatory authority
over the species in question, either NMFS or the Fish and Wildlife Service
(FWS). Under FWS regulations take is prohibited for any species once
it is listed as threatened, whereas the NMFS approach has been to develop
boiler plate regulations prohibiting take for each species listed. The
4(d) Rule offers a means to relax the normal prohibitions on “take”
usually applied to threatened species. Under 4(d) Rules, NMFS or FWS
apply prohibitions on activities deemed necessary for the conservation
of the species for which they have stewardship responsibilities. Under
the new approach being tested in the in the Pacific Northwest, NMFS
has created flexibility to allow for the integration of adaptive species
management and recovery programs at the local levels into a larger federal
management strategy. In turn, incorporation of provisions dealing with
approved local activities in a 4(d) Rule offers important protections
to local governments.
Environment International Ltd. has dealt with many of these issues.
EI has educated local government officials regarding 4(d) and the federal
regulatory regime. Importantly, EI has also helped governments develop
a dialogue with NMFS and FWS officials. Among other things, EI is advising
a Washington city on ESA issues in connection with a Brownfields redevelopment
project and is considering where there are wins for economic development
and salmon restoration. It is still too soon to tell whether this Pacific
Coast experiment will be a success. With the federal government searching
for ways to streamline the ESA process, what happens here will resonate
throughout the country. The Fish and Wildlife Service has developed
a similar strategy for managing bull trout and other species that are
listed throughout the Pacific Coast. The 4(d) experiment taking place
here is a continuously changing process- one which EI monitors closely.